Type parameters can also be declared within method and constructor signatures to create generic methods and generic constructors. This is similar to declaring a generic type, but the type parameter's scope is limited to the method or constructor in which it's declared.Here we've added one generic method, named/** * This version introduces a generic method. */ public class Box<T> { private T t; public void add(T t) { this.t = t; } public T get() { return t; } public <U> void inspect(U u){ System.out.println("T: " + t.getClass().getName()); System.out.println("U: " + u.getClass().getName()); } public static void main(String[] args) { Box<Integer> integerBox = new Box<Integer>(); integerBox.add(new Integer(10)); integerBox.inspect("some text"); } }inspect
, that defines one type parameter, namedU
. This method accepts an object and prints its type to standard output. For comparison, it also prints out the type ofT
. For convenience, this class now also has amain
method so that it can be run as an application.The output from this program is:
T: java.lang.Integer U: java.lang.StringBy passing in different types, the output will change accordingly.
A more realistic use of generic methods might be something like the following, which defines a static method that stuffs references to a single item into multiple boxes:
To use this method, your code would look something like the following:public static <U> void fillBoxes(U u, List<Box<U>> boxes) { for (Box<U> box : boxes) { box.add(u); } }The complete syntax for invoking this method is:Crayon red = ...; List<Box<Crayon>> crayonBoxes = ...;Here we've explicitly provided the type to be used asBox.<Crayon>fillBoxes(red, crayonBoxes);U
, but more often than not, this can be left out and the compiler will infer the type that's needed:This feature, known as type inference, allows you to invoke a generic method as you would an ordinary method, without specifying a type between angle brackets.Box.fillBoxes(red, crayonBoxes); // compiler infers that U is Crayon